<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:exif="http://www.exif.org/specifications.html">
  <title>AlexBakerPhotoz's recent videos</title>
  <subtitle type="html">I has been a photographer for a long time now.&#13;
I have 2 rules of photography.  &#13;
Rule one: The equipment is no more important than the artist's brush, but good brushes help.&#13;
Rule two (this is the important one) Photography is the art of selective elimination.&#13;
&#13;
My first camera was a Zeiss Super Iconta B folding 120 roll film camera that my dad gave me in the early '60s. If you know what that is raise your hand. Eventually I scraped up a few bucks to trade that classic in on a new Nikkormat. Oh, well, I was young.  I spent the next few decades working with 35MM Nikons, a twin lens Rolli, then a Bronica S 120MM SLR that usually worked. I gave up trying to make a living in photography and got simple for another couple of decades with cameras that fit in my pocket and fell back on my 2 rules.  Digital cameras were a natural fit for me.  I sold all my darkroom equipment and never looked back.  I still have a 35MM Nikon and 5 or 6 lenses and that balky old Bronica, but their shutters are still now. I currently have a Canon A80 that has an underwater housing and uses AA batteries which can be very convenient, a new Olympus Stylus 1030 that is waterproof to 10 meters and fits in a pocket and a Nikon D80 that feels really sweet in my hands.  The Nikon 18 - 135 zoom replaces 5 lenses I used to carry back in the day and the 70 - 300 covers the rest of my usual range and that VR is oh-so-nice. I could not resist a 50mm 1.4 just for old times sake and on the DX format, it's rather like the old fast Nikon 85mm from days gone by.  &#13;
&#13;
I still believe it's not the equipment that makes a good picture, but the equipment is a joy nonetheless and it certainly does help, especially with digital equipment. When it comes to pixels, more is more and VR is awful nice.&#13;
&#13;
Also - it's very hard to decide between fishing and photographing. . .&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
Another thing:  There are a lot of fine photographers in the world and I love and admire their work.  You can see a lot of them here on Smugmug.</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/hack/feed.mg?Type=recentVideos&amp;Data=AlexBakerPhotoz&amp;format=atom10"/>
  <icon>http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/Other/BackEnd/Alex-Hemmingway-Sepia-small/226872587_yhDYs-300x300.jpg</icon>
  <id>http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/</id>
  <updated>2009-01-25T12:07:10Z</updated>
  <rights>Copyright 2009, the copyright holder of each photograph.  Some portions copyright SmugMug.  All rights reserved.</rights>
  <generator uri="http://www.smugmug.com/">SmugMug</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Jelly at Monterey Bay Aquarium</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/Underwater/In-the-flow-Below/4018271_vopER#234116656_xnJth"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com"&gt;AlexBakerPhotoz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jelly at Monterey Bay Aquarium&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/Underwater/In-the-flow-Below/4018271_vopER#234116656_xnJth" title="Jelly at Monterey Bay Aquarium"&gt;&lt;img src="http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/Underwater/In-the-flow-Below/MOV00848/234116656_xnJth-Th.jpg" width="150" height="113" alt="Jelly at Monterey Bay Aquarium" title="Jelly at Monterey Bay Aquarium" style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-01-25T12:07:10Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AlexBakerPhotoz</name>
      <uri>http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://alexbakerphotoz.smugmug.com/Underwater/In-the-flow-Below/MOV00848/234116656_xnJth-640.mp4</id>
  </entry>
</feed>
